Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
- S. K. Srivastava
- Ramesh Chand
- Jaspal Singh
- Amrit Pal Kaur
- Rajni Jain
- I. Kingsly
- J. Charles Jeeva
- Shubhadeep Ghosh
- Sekar Megarajan
- V. P. Vipinkumar
- Loveson Edward
- R. Narayanakumar
- A. P. Dineshbabu
- Sujitha Thomas
- Josileen Jose
- P. T. Sarada
- Lakshmi Pillai
- Rekha Devi Chakraborty
- Gyanranjan Dash
- Anulekshmi Chellappan
- G. B. Purushottama
- Rajan Kumar
- M. Rajkumar
- Indira Divipala
- D. Nakhava Ajay
- R. Ratheeshkumar
- K. V. Akhilesh
- V. Mahesh
- Swathipriyanka Sen
- Rajesh Pradhan
- Shikha Rahangdale
- R. Vinothkumar
- Shoba Joe Kizhakudan
- K. M. Rajesh
- P. S. Swathilekshmi
- G. Maheswarudu
- M. Sivadas
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Raju, S. S.
- Revisiting Groundwater Depletion and its Implications on Farm Economics in Punjab, India
Abstract Views :264 |
PDF Views:79
Authors
S. K. Srivastava
1,
Ramesh Chand
2,
Jaspal Singh
1,
Amrit Pal Kaur
1,
Rajni Jain
1,
I. Kingsly
1,
S. S. Raju
3
Affiliations
1 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, DPS Marg, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 NITI Aayog, Government of India, New Delhi 110 001, IN
3 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Visakhapatnam 530 003, IN
1 ICAR-National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, DPS Marg, Pusa, New Delhi 110 012, IN
2 NITI Aayog, Government of India, New Delhi 110 001, IN
3 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Visakhapatnam 530 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 113, No 03 (2017), Pagination: 422-429Abstract
The study identifies factors behind the groundwater depletion in Punjab (India) and examines the economics of groundwater irrigation across farm-size categories, varied groundwater levels and energy policy scenario. The farm-level evidences point out that farmers with smaller land holdings incur 2-3 times groundwater cost than those with larger land holdings. Also, small farmers are affected more adversely due to falling groundwater level. Further, financial expenses in extracting groundwater are borne equally by the society and the farmers. The withdrawal of energy subsidy is expected to reduce net returns, but at a varying rate across different crops. However, crop cultivation would still be profitable and desubsidization will result in 29-82% savings in existing groundwater use in different crops.Keywords
Crop Profitability, Energy Subsidy, Farm Economics, Groundwater Depletion.References
- Sidhu, R. S., Vatta, K. and Dhaliwal, H. S., Conservation agriculture in Punjab: economic implications of technologies and practices. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2010, 53(3), 1413–1427.
- Kaur, S. and Vatta, K., Groundwater depletion in central Punjab: pattern, access and adaptations. Curr. Sci., 2015, 108(4), 485–490.
- Kaur, B., Sidhu, R. S. and Vatta, K., Optimal crop plans for sustainable water use in Punjab. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2010, 23, 273–284.
- Sarkar, A., Scio-economic implications of depleting groundwater resources in Punjab: a comparative analysis of different irrigation systems. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2011, 46(7), 59–66.
- Srivastava, S. K. et al., Unsustainable groundwater use in Punjab agriculture: insights from cost of cultivation survey. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2015, 70(3), 365–378.
- Gupta, S., Groundwater management in alluvial areas. In Technical Paper in Special Session on Groundwater in the Fifth Asian Regional Conference on Indian National Committee on Irrigation and Drainage (INCID), New Delhi, 2009.
- Srivastava, S. K., Srivastava, R. C., Sethi, R. R., Kumar, A. and Nayak, A. K., Accelerating groundwater and energy use for agricultural growth in Odisha: technological and policy issues. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2014, 27(2), 259–270.
- Ballabh, V., Policies of water management and sustainable water use. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 2003, 58(3), 467–476.
- Ghosh, S., Srivastava, S. K., Nayak, A. K., Panda, D. K., Nanda, P. and Kumar, A., Why impacts of irrigation on agrarian dynamism and livelihoods are contrasting? Evidence from eastern India states. Irrig. Drain., 2014, 65(3), 573–583.
- Sekhri, S., Sustaining groundwater: role of policy reforms in promoting conservation in India. In India Policy Forum, 2012/2013 (eds Shah, S., Bosworth, B. and Panagariya, A.), Sage Publications, New Delhi, 2013, vol. 9, pp. 149–176.
- Sarkar, A. and Das, A., Groundwater irrigation–electricity–crop diversification nexus in Punjab: trends, turning points and policy initiatives. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 2014, 49(52), 64–73.
- Malik, R. P. S., Energy regulations as a demand management option: potentials, problems, and prospects. In Strategic Analyses of the National River Linking Project (NRLP) of India, Series 3, Promoting Irrigation Demand Management in India: Potentials, Problems and Prospects (ed. Saleth, R. M.), International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 2008, pp. 71–92.
- Chand, R., Emerging crisis in Punjab agriculture: Severity and options for future. Econ. Polit. Wkly, 1999, 34(13), A2–A10.
- Kumar, D., Demand management in the face of growing water scarcity and conflicts in India: Institutional and policy alternatives for future. In Water Resources and Sustainable Livelihoods and Eco-System Services (eds Chopra, K., Rao, C. H. H. and Sengupta. R.), Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi, 2009, pp. 97–131.
- Kulkarni, H. and Shah, M., Punjab water syndrome: diagnostics and prescriptions. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 2013, 48(52), 64–73.
- Government of India, Fourth Census of Minor Irrigation Schemes Report, Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, New Delhi, 2014.
- Central Groundwater Board, Dynamic Groundwater Resources of India (as on 31 March 2011). Ministry of Water Resources, River Development and Ganga Rejuvenation, Faridabad, 2014.
- Government of Punjab, Punjab at a Glance (district-wise), Economic Advisor to Government of Punjab, Department of Planning, 2012.
- Central Groundwater Board, Master plan for artificial recharge to groundwater in India, Ministry of Water Resources, Government of India, 2013; http://cgwb.gov.in/documents/MasterPlan2013.pdf.
- Singh, K., Act to save groundwater in Punjab: its impact on water table, electricity subsidy and environment. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2009. 22 (conference issue), 365–386.
- Kaul, J. L. and Sekhon, S., Flexibility and reliability of irrigation systems and their effect on farming: a case of Punjab. Indian J. Agric. Econ., 1991, 46(4), 587–592.
- Singh, D., Who gains and who loses in the game of groundwater markets in water-scarce regions. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev., 2007, 20(2), 345–360.
- Moench, M. H., Chasing the water table: equity and sustainability in groundwater management. Econ. Polit. Wkly., 1992, 27(51–52), A171–A177.
- Rosegrant, M., Water resources in 21st century: challenges and implications for action. Food, Agriculture and Environment Discussion Paper 20, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, USA, 1997.
- Kumar, M. D., Impact of electricity prices and volumetric water allocation on energy and groundwater demand management: analysis from western India. Energ. Policy, 2005, 33(1), 39–51.
- Briscoe, J. and Malik, R. P. S., India’s Water Economy: Bracing for a Turbulent Future, Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2006.
- Success of cage farming of marine finfishes in doubling farmers’ income: a techno-social impact analysis
Abstract Views :144 |
PDF Views:70
Authors
J. Charles Jeeva
1,
Shubhadeep Ghosh
1,
S. S. Raju
1,
Sekar Megarajan
1,
V. P. Vipinkumar
2,
Loveson Edward
1,
R. Narayanakumar
3
Affiliations
1 Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India, IN
2 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, India, IN
3 Regional Station of ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Chennai 600 028, India, IN
1 Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India, IN
2 ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, India, IN
3 Regional Station of ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Chennai 600 028, India, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 123, No 8 (2022), Pagination: 1031-1037Abstract
In Andhra Pradesh, India, the culture of marine finfishes such as Indian pompano and Asian seabass has been demonstrated in cages in Krishna and Godavari backwaters by the Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute (ICAR-CMFRI), Visakhapatnam, involving fishermen and marginal landless aqua farmers. Open sea cage culture of orange-spotted grouper and Indian pompano has also been demonstrated in Visakhapatnam, Srikakulam and East Godavari districts of Andhra Pradesh. From the 14 success stories documented, enhancement in net income in the range 50.32%–257.14% was evident by transforming people from different avocations such as agriculturists, wage earners in agriculture and allied sectors, business professionals, fish traders, traditional fish farmers and artisanal fishers to marine finfish farming. The benefit ratio of cage farming among the adopted farmers was found to be 1.33 and 1.31 for estuarine and marine cages respectively. The impact was realized on livelihood enhancement due to the technological interventions of cage culture under the technological, social and economic dimensionsReferences
- Sekar, M. et al., Popularising cage culture of marine finfish among tribal population in coastal Andhra Pradesh. Aquacult. Spectr., 2021a, 4(11), 12–19.
- Ritesh, R., Sekar, M., Biji, X., Dash, B., Ghosh, S., Menon, M. and Edward, L. L., Conditioning, maturation and year-round natural spawning of orange-spotted grouper, Epinephelus coioides (Hamilton, 1822), in re-circulating aquaculture system. Aquacult. Res., 2017, 48, 5864–5873.
- Ritesh, R., Sekar, M., Biji, X., Ghosh, S., Santosh, B. and Gopalakrishnan, A., Broodstock development, induced breeding and larval rearing of Indian pompano, Trachinotus mookalee (Cuvier, 1832) – a new candidate species for aquaculture. Aquaculture, 2018, 495, 550–557.
- Gopal, N., Small scale fisheries guidelines from the resource and energy conservation perspective. In ICAR Winter School: Responsible Fishing: Recent Advances in Resource and Energy Conservation, 21 November–11 December 2019, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Kochi, 2019.
- Jha, D. K. et al., Estimation of potential zones for offshore mariculture in the Indian Sea using geographical information system as a management tool. J. Coast. Conserv., 2017, 21, 893–902.
- Ignatious, B., Cage aquaculture. In THEERANAIPUNYA – Equipping the Fisherwomen Youth for the Future – Training Manual (eds Shyam, S. S. and Fernandez, R.), ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2016, p. 175.
- Jeeva, J. C., Balasubramaniam, S. and Vasanthakumar, J., Attitude towards participatory technology development – a study among fishery researchers. J. Extens. Educ., 2006, 18(3 and 4), 3851–3856.
- Garrett, H. E. and Woodworth, R. S., Statistics in Psychology and Education, Vakils, Feiffer and Simons Pvt Ltd, Bombay, 1969, p. 329.
- Vipinkumar, V. P. et al., Cage farming of fish – a success story of SHGs. Mar. Fish. Inform. Serv. Tech. Extens. Ser., 2021, 250, 28–29.
- Jeeva, J. C., Sekar, M., Vipinkumar, V. P., Raju, S. S., Nagaraju, P. and Ghosh, S., Gender mainstreaming through coastal cage farming – a success story from Andhra Pradesh. Mar. Fish. Inf. Serv. Techn. Extens. Ser., 2021, 250, 30–31.
- Sekar, M., Ritesh, R., Ghosh, S., Biji, X., Shiva, P. and Sadhu, N., Dissemination of cage culture technology among Scheduled Tribes in coastal Andhra Pradesh – a successful model for livelihood improvement. Mar. Fish. Inf. Ser. Techn. Extens. Ser., 2021, 250, 32–35.
- Bycatch in Indian trawl fisheries and some suggestions for trawl bycatch mitigation
Abstract Views :117 |
PDF Views:60
Authors
A. P. Dineshbabu
1,
Sujitha Thomas
1,
Josileen Jose
1,
P. T. Sarada
1,
Lakshmi Pillai
1,
Rekha Devi Chakraborty
1,
Gyanranjan Dash
1,
Anulekshmi Chellappan
1,
Shubhadeep Ghosh
1,
G. B. Purushottama
1,
Rajan Kumar
1,
M. Rajkumar
1,
Indira Divipala
1,
D. Nakhava Ajay
1,
R. Ratheeshkumar
1,
K. V. Akhilesh
1,
V. Mahesh
1,
Swathipriyanka Sen
1,
Rajesh Pradhan
1,
Shikha Rahangdale
1,
R. Vinothkumar
1,
Shoba Joe Kizhakudan
1,
K. M. Rajesh
1,
R. Narayanakumar
1,
P. S. Swathilekshmi
1,
S. S. Raju
1,
G. Maheswarudu
1,
M. Sivadas
1
Affiliations
1 Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, India, IN
1 Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi 682 018, India, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 123, No 11 (2022), Pagination: 1372-1380Abstract
Globally, trawl is the major fishing gear used in marine fisheries and in India, it contributes to more than one-third of the marine fish production. Trawl fishing has been critically evaluated from a sustainability perspective, especially analysing its bycatch composition. Most of the bycatch from trawlers contains valuable edible species with high market demand. However, a portion of the bycatch which does not have such demand in the edible fish market, known as low-value bycatch (LVB), continues to be a matter of concern from an ecological and economic perspective. During 2017–19, 30–60% of trawl landing in India was constituted by LVB, which was mainly used for fishmeal preparation. To enhance the value and utility of LVB, this study explores the possibility of converting waste from LVB into edible resources using pufferfish and triggerfish. It also highlights the positive impact of efforts by different Government agencies for bycatch mitigation like the implementation of minimum legal size in reducing the juvenile component in bycatch, with a social survey-based account of fisher’s perceptions and suggestions on successful bycatch mitigationKeywords
Ecological impacts, fishery economics, low-value bycach, minimum legal size, trawl.References
- Jennings, S. and Kaiser, M. J., The effects of fishing on marine ecosystems. Adv. Mar. Biol., 1998, 34, 201–352.
- Freese, L., Auster, P. J., Heifetz, J. and Wing, B. L., Effects of trawling on seafloor habitat and associated invertebrate taxa in the Gulf of Alaska. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 1999, 189, 119–126.
- Jennings, S., Nicholson, M. D., Dinmore, T. A. and Lancaster, J., The effect of chronic trawling disturbance on the production of infaunal communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 2002, 243, 251–260.
- Collie, J., Hiddink, J. G., van Kooten, T., Rijnsdorp, A. D., Kaiser, M. J., Jennings, S. and Hilborn, R., Indirect effects of bottom fishing on the productivity of marine fish. Fish Fish., 2017, 18, 619–637.
- George, M. J., Suseelan, C. and Balan, K., By-catch of shrimp fish-eries in India. Mar. Fish. Inf. Serv. T&E Ser., 1981, 28, 3–13.
- Gordon, A., The bycatch from Indian shrimp trawlers in the Bay of Bengal: the potential for its improved utilization. Bay of Bengal Programme, Natural Resources Institute, Overseas Development Administration, Madras. BOBP/WP/68, 1991, p. 32.
- Dineshbabu, A. P., Sujitha, T. and Salian, S., Impact of trawling in Indian waters – a review. Fish. Technol., 2016, 53, 263–272.
- Kizhakudan, S. J., Lakshmi, P. S., Gomathy, S., Thirumilu, P. and Poovannan, P., Assessment of low-value by-catch (LVB) in bottom trawl landing at Kasimedu, Chennai during 2006–2011. Mar. Fish.Inf. Serv. T&E Ser., 2013, 218, 23–26.
- Dineshbabu, A. P., Sujitha, T. and Vivekanandan, E., Assessment of low value bycatch and its application for management of trawl fisheries. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. India, 2014, 56(1), 103–108.
- Mohamed, K. S. et al., Minimum legal size (MLS) of capture to avoid growth overfishing of commercially exploited fish and shellfish species of Kerala. Mar. Fish. Infor. Serv. T&E Ser., 2014, 220, 3–7.
- Madhu, V. R., Raphael, L., Jeevan, J., Antony, V. T. and Edwin, L., Status of by-catch from commercial trawlers operated off Central Kerala. Fish. Technol., 2017, 54, 162–169.
- Muktha, M. et al., Policy guidance on sustaining the marine fisheries of Andhra Pradesh. CMFRI Marine Fisheries Policy (9). ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2018, pp. 1–62.
- Mahesh, V., Dineshbabu, A. P., Naik, A. S. K., Anjanayappa, H.N., Vijaykumar, M. E. and Khavi, M., Characterization of low value by-catch in trawl fisheries off Karnataka coast, India and its impact on juveniles of commercially important fish species. Indian J. Geo-Mar. Sci., 2019, 48(12), 1733–1742.
- Behera, P. R., Ghosh, S., Sreeramulu, K., Muktha, M., Jishnudev, M. A. and Satish, K. M., The cost of fishing on juveniles of finfish and shellfish: assessment of economic impacts of trawl juvenile by-catch along the coast of North Andhra Pradesh, India. Thalassas, 2021, 37, 409–426.
- Christensen, V., Managing fisheries involving predator species and prey. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 1996, 6, 417–442.
- Dineshbabu, A. P. and Radhakrishnan, E. V., Trawl fishery of juve-nile fishes along Mangalore–Malpe coast of Karnataka and its impact on fish stock. Asian Fish. Sci., 2009, 22(2), 491–500.
- Costa, M. E., Erzini, K. and Borges, T. C., Bycatch of crustacean and fish bottom trawl fisheries from southern Portugal (Algarve).Sci. Mar., 2008, 72(4), 801–814.
- Garces, L. R. et al., Spatial structure of demersal fish assemblages in south and southeast Asia and implications for fisheries manage-ment. Fish. Res., 2006, 78(2–3), 143–157.
- Nightingale, A., A feminist in the forest: situated knowledge and mixing methods in natural resource management. ACME, 2003, 2(1), 77–90.
- Sruthy, I. S., Anju and Ram Mohan, M. K., Fish meal industry: a perspective towards food security and focused research needs.MPEDA Newsl., 2020, 7(10), 44–47.
- Aswathy, N. and Narayanakumar, R., Economic and environmental implications of trawl fishing: an analysis in Munambam fishing harbour on the south west coast of India. Curr. Appl. Sci. Technol., 2020, 39(13), 89–93.
- Dineshbabu, A. P., Sujitha, T. and Dinesh, A. C., Handbook on Ap-plication of GIS as a Decision Support Tool in Marine Fisheries, CMFRI Special Publication No. 121, ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Kochi, 2016, p. 104.
- Madhu, V. R., A review of trawl selectivity studies carried out along Indian coast. Fish. Technol., 2018, 55, 1–18.
- Squires, D., Balance, L. T., Dagorn, L., Dutton, P. H. and Lent, R., Mitigating bycatch: novel insights to multidisciplinary approaches.Front. Mar. Sci.. 2021, 8, 1–19.
- Boopendranath, M. R., Waste minimization in fishing operations.Fis. Technol., 2012, 49, 109–119.
- Vivekanandan, E., Seasonal fishing ban: need for collecting and applying right type of scientific information. Mar. Fish Inform.Serv. T&E Ser., 2019, 240, 7–16.
- Dineshbabu, A. P., Sujitha, T. and Radhakrishnan, E. V., Spatio-temporal analysis and impact assessment of trawl bycatch of Karna-taka to suggest operation based fishery management options. IndianJ. Fish., 2012, 59(2), 27–38.
- Graham, N., Ferro, R. S. T., Karp, W. A. and MacMullen, P., Fishing practice, gear design, and the ecosystem approach – three case studies demonstrating the effect of management strategy on gear selectivity and discards. ICES J. Mar. Sci., 2007, 64, 744–750.
- Mohamed, K. S. et al., Report of the committee to evaluate fish wealth and impact of trawl ban along Kerala coast, Department of Fisheries, Government of Kerala, 2014, p. 85.
- Rohit, Prathibha et al., Marine Fisheries Policy Series-5; Manage-ment Plans for the Marine Fisheries of Karnataka. CMFRI Marine Fisheries Policy (5). ICAR-Central Marine Fisheries Research In-stitute, Kochi, 2016, p. 110.
- Haraksingh, T. S., James, D., Toppe, J., Subasinghe, R. and Karuna-sagar, I., Maximizing the contribution of fish to human nutrition. In Second International Conference on Nutrition: Better Nutrition Better Lives, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy and World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014.
- Saha, P., Sujitha, T., Salian, S., Dineshbabu, A. P., Rohit, P. and Nataraja, G. D., Fishery and GIS based spatio-temporal distribution analysis of smooth blaasop, Lagocephalus inermis in southeastern Arabian Sea. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2019, 20(4), 267–278.
- Pramod, G., Illegal, unreported and unregulated marine fish catches in the Indian exclusive economic zone. Field Report, Policy and Ecosystem Restoration in Fisheries, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, BC, Vancouver, Canada, 2010, p. 30.